Written as an afterword to this work, Concluding Unscientific Postscript is on one level a philosophical jest, yet on another it is Climacus’s characterization of the. Concluding Unscientific Postscript to the Philosophical Fragments (Danish: Afsluttende uvidenskabelig Efterskrift til de philosophiske Smuler) is an work by. One of the most noteworthy features of Kierkegaard’s Concluding Unscientific Postscript: A Critical Guide is that it lives up to its subtitle.
|Published (Last):||3 September 2008|
|PDF File Size:||8.37 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||13.1 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Kierkegaard strongly criticised both the Hegelianism of his time and what he saw as the empty formalities of the Church of Denmark. Amazon Giveaway allows you to run promotional giveaways in order to create buzz, reward your audience, and attract new followers and customers.
Readings that unsdientific a collapse of one of these to the other cannot be sustained, but how to understand their relation precisely is clearly a matter of ongoing debate. Interestingly, instead of monastery life a withdrawal from the Present AgeKierkegaard recommends living humanly as we are, being aware of our limits, and face up to the guilt we thus call upon ourselves before God.
Direct communication consists of statements that can be communicated and understood without postsctipt, that is, without experiencing personally what is being communicated. The object is the truth. Put otherwise, for Kierkegaard truth lies in subjectivity, or more precisely kierkegaatd one’s relation to what is true. The dozen essays collected here none penned by a Dane, interestingly speak to the largest themes of this notoriously difficult and overlong work and stay admirably focused on what the reader needs to keep in mind very generally to come to grips with the text.
It cannot, then, be a surprise to see man more and more engulfed in the object, in things, in material unscientidic, in economic life, in technics, in a one-sided, quantitative manner of thinking, and in quantitative standards of value.
The second-stage Hong edition puts it similarly: Then he steps back, prudently, from the scene. In particular, Climacus can grasp the oierkegaard of a religious world-view, and even insert himself hypothetically into such a world-view for the sake of ridiculing the world outside of it, all without committing to that world-view himself.
At once ironic, humorous, and polemical, this work takes on the “unscientific” form of a mimical-pathetical-dialectical compilation of ideas. Written as an afterword to this work, Concluding Unscientific Postscript is on one level a philosophical jest, yet on another it is Climacus’s characterization of the subjective thinker’s relation to the truth of Christianity. Hannay’s key strength as a translator is his daring.
The question as to whether Kierkegaard was an existentialist was brought postscritp by Libuse Lukas Miller. Shopbop Designer Fashion Brands. For sure, Postacript does say that truth involves, even necessarily, a degree of “objective uncertainty”, namely that, objectively speaking, that which one believes to be the truth may well turn out to be mistaken.
unsciwntific Retrieved from ” https: Tomorrow will Be my Dancing Day. An Essay in Experimental Psychologytr. His philosophy and theology are focused on transition from an impersonal confession from theorizing about someone’s misdeed in abstracto to a platform of specified human interrelationships.
Review “The postsscript edition of the Writings. To his great credit, Hannay resists this temptation unfailingly. What is required in order to go beyond Socratic recollection of eternal ideas already possessed by the learner?
Ships from and kierkegqard by Amazon. It does not, however, mean that Kierkegaard rejects the existence of objective norms. How can we tell, the Postscript asks, when a prayer to God is authentic?
This is especially relevant regarding religion. It seems to me that faith is about how we press on in full recognition of this fact, without invalidating through sentimentality the eventuality of death and other departures without return, or being paralyzed by despair.
Refresh and try again. There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Kierkegaard left the task of discovering the meaning of his works to the reader, because “the task must be made difficult, for only the difficult inspires the noble-hearted”.
S. Kierkegaard Concluding Unscientific | Valentina Cizmar –
The work is a poignant attack against Hegelianismthe philosophy of Hegelespecially Hegel’s Science of Logic. How it is so, however, is far from clear. This page was postsrcipt edited on 30 Decemberat In this frame of reference, kiegkegaard can mean different – but not mutually exclusive – things.
The first total opponent of Hegel’s standpoint was Soren Kierkegaard, father of modern existentialism. Lists with This Book. She wrote the following in