Anattalakkhana Sutta. — The characteristic of no-Self — [anattā·lakkhaṇa] But it is because rūpa is anatta that rūpa lends itself to dis·ease, and that it cannot. The Anatta-Lakkhana Sutta explains how a wrong view of self arises within impermanence and how this wrong view of self results in ongoing suffering. lakkhaṇa Su a taught by the Buddha. This discourse, when produced in pe-wri en copy, comprised pages because it was meticu- lously anscribed by.
|Published (Last):||6 May 2005|
|PDF File Size:||2.63 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||9.63 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Yasma ca kho, bhikkhave, rupam anatta, tasma riipam abadhaya samvattati, na ca labbhati riipe – ‘evam me rupam hotu, evam me riipam ma ahosf’ti. From form and the arising of illness and suffering, one also grasps the desire to make form like this, or not like this.
It seems that the self must be a thing that is absent misery and suffering. There is no conventionality, however great or small or even minute, involved in the mind.
Anattalakkhana Sutta – Wikipedia
As illusion overspreads [them], they do not know or see. This is analogous to the poor woman who cannot see the gold, even though lakhana possesses it. Regarding form, it is also not possible to cause it to be like this, or not like this, because form is not oneself.
Want to add to the discussion? As they do not befriend sutra good teacher of the Way, they practise non-Self and do not know where it [Self] is. Yasma ca kho, bhikkhave, sarikhara anatta, tasma sarikhara abadhaya samvattanti, na ca labbhati sarikharesu – ‘evam me sarikhara hontu, evam me sarikhara ma ahesu”‘nti.
Assaji in this order. He gave this discourse to the original group of five ascetics that he had been practicing with. This is not dualistic consciousness, anattaa. Overhung by illusion, this thought arises. Bhiksus, why is it said that one who has the idea of a Self is arrogant and haughty, traversing round Samsara? In the Anatta-lakhanna Sutta the Buddha is simply going through the five Skandhas aggregates in turn, and explaining that none of them are unchangeable, that they are all impermanent, and none can therefore be the basis of an ever-unchanging “self” or “soul”.
It is always overspread by various defilements and is not seen. As defilement overspreds [them], beings cannot see. If all beings see this, they are gladdened and will take refuge in the Tathagata.
Please be respectful of others. It seems to me that the ascetics were released from the effluents permanently, and had no need to seek release afterwards ever again. Vimuttasmim vimuttamiti nanam hoti. I now let persons see the Buddha-Nature that they possess, which is overspread by defilements.
And they are reigned over by greed, lust, anger, and ignorance. There, indeed, the Blessed One addressed the group of five monks.
The doctrine of the Self shines brilliantly; it is like the rising of the apocalyptic fire [lit. If I am reading the Canon correctly, that seems to be slightly different than what happens here. shtta
There surely is the Buddha-Nature. Such Self has, from the very beginning, been under cover of innumerable defilements. Attamana pancavaggiya bhikkhii bhagavato bhasitam abhinandum [abhinandunti ka. And we actually find a passage in another discourse that says he had to first convince them that he was enlightened, and afterward worked with them for a period of what seems like either weeks or possibly months:.
I would teach two monks while three went for alms, and we six lived off what the three brought back from their alms round. The karma generated by the mind leads a person, though born a human, into such lives as a cripple, lame, deaf, blind or dumb person, and to the 25 existences, where such as greed, lust, anger and ignorance reign over the mind, and the person is unable to know of the presence of the Buddha-Nature.
How, then, could they know the true nature of the Self itself? I’ve been on a Sutta Discovery kick lately, so here’s Piya Tan’s take on this to add to the discussion: Forms, feelings, perception, mental fabrication, and consciousness treated with right discernment: What an experience that must have been!
What is this Self? I now know a few suttas to read.
On ascending the throne, he asks the ministers: Bhiksus, you give rise to the idea of Bliss with regard to phenomena associated with suffering; the idea of Eternity with regard to phenomena associated with impermanence; the idea of the Self with regard to phenomena without Self; and the idea of Purity with regard to phenomena that are impure.
This is not what I am. What is nonself should be seen as it really is with correct wisdom thus: Please login or register.