David Boonin-Vail. In her article, “A Defense of Abortion,” Judith Jarvis Thomson defended the following thesis: the impermissibility of abortion does. David Boonin has written the most thorough and detailed case for the moral permissibility of abortion yet published. Critically examining a wide range of. Boonin, David, A Defense of Abortion, Cambridge University Press, , pp, $ (pbk), ISBN Reviewed by: Win-chiat Lee.
|Published (Last):||22 August 2007|
|PDF File Size:||1.25 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||20.55 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Sometimes his language is a bit abogtion philosophical, but on the other hand, that’s what philosophy is for: This defense of the permissibility of abortion is very controversial. Paperbackpages.
A Defense of Abortion
Cambridge University Press- Medical – pages. Issues for Service Providers: Write a customer review. Boonib, it depends on whether dxvid baby can be given up for adoption—if no one is ready to adopt the child and no other way exists to avoid parenthood once the child is bornthen, of course, there would be no difference between abortion and infanticide in this regard. Second, suppose that the infant being outside the womb is sufficient to indicate that infanticide is impermissible.
This book has also been helpful in detailing how the logic works in analogies and why the weirdness objection is not valid. It is understandable that given the contentious nature of the subject, Boonin’s defense of abortion eefense employ such a strategy in order to make a more effective contribution to the debate. However, the theories of consent that are offered are actually really, really bad; alternative theories of consent would make the sbortion for the moral permissibility of abortion a lot easier not necessarily Boonin’s goal, of course but also make the book more rigorous.
In an admittedly less obvious way, an account based on a criterion of delayed hominization that bboonin to justify abortion of fetuses with Down syndrome also seems vulnerable to this objection. AmazonGlobal Ship Orders Internationally.
Jennifer is currently reading it Apr 15, Behavioral and Brain Sciences. My conclusion, therefore, is that it seems problematic to both justify abortion of fetuses with Down syndrome and, at the same time, to reject the permissibility of infanticide.
David Boonin, A Defense of Abortion – PhilPapers
Consequently, in order to avoid becoming a parent to a child with Down syndrome, one can eliminate the fetus by abortion, kill the infant, or give the infant up for adoption. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities.
Remember that those seeking to abort a fetus with Down syndrome have initially accepted the burden of pregnancy—given that they decide ravid abort the fetus only after it is found to have Down syndrome. Even given that, it was a joy to read this book. If this conclusion is correct, and if we care about how we justify our actions, what approach should be taken toward abortion and infanticide?
To this end, Boonin goes over a very large number of such arguments, organized around three themes, and shows how they all fail. The ethics of abortion: Even if it were both feasible and permissible aborion render a fetus unconscious by artificial means once it has been born in order to be permitted to kill it, what would be the point?
Why would a woman choose to deliver an anaesthetized fetus?
The criteria related to consciousness do not exclude infanticide simply because an infant can be born without having been conscious at earlier stages. This percentage indicates that, considering only the European areas under examination, about infants were born with Down syndrome without parents being aware of it before birth. This strategy, if it had worked, would have been the most robust way of defending abortion rights while, at the same time, rejecting the permissibility of infanticide.
Why would it be morally permissible in that situation to abort the fetus, but not to kill the infant? Defending the abortion right in the face of contemporary opposition. But what exactly does it mean to say that abortion is morally permissible?
A Defense of Abortion // Reviews // Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews // University of Notre Dame
First, there is the discussion of the all-too-familiar question, whether the fetus has the right to life Chs. Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read. On the contrary, the most plausible version of the GS argument can differentiate between the abortion of fetuses with Down syndrome and infanticide.
If our interest is abortipn only in engaging the critics of abortion, but also in knowing the truth of the matter, then these premises themselves will also need to be examined. Given that the information about the fetus having Down goonin is preceded by the information about detense pregnancy, I assume that an individual decides to maintain her life-supporting assistance when she realizes that she is connected to the violinist, but that she changes her mind after being informed about the status of the violinist.
Does not this fact undermine the argument? Amazon Renewed Refurbished products with a defdnse. The possibility of infants being born without having been conscious means that they also can be born without having been sentient or having had desires.
In contrast, the third strategy for justifying abortion while rejecting infanticide is to find one way of justifying abortion, and—if it turns out that this criterion cannot exclude the permissibility of infanticide—another way of rejecting infanticide. The Good Samaritan Argument. Amazon Advertising Find, attract, and engage customers.
More generally, the problem can be formulated in the following way: I begin with the following thought experiment.